لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
Due to recent amendment, the court imposed a more severe sentence than would have been possible under the previous version from the regulation.
4. It has been noticed by this Court that there can be a delay of in the future within the registration of FIR which hasn't been explained with the complainant. Moreover, there is no eye-witness of your alleged prevalence plus the prosecution is counting on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession on the petitioners has been tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram happened to be the real brothers with the deceased but they did not respond in the slightest degree to your confessional statements in the petitioners and calmly saw them leaving, a single after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not look much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on fourteen.02.2018 and there isn't any explanation regarding why her arrest was not effected after making with the alleged extra judicial confession. It's been held on so many events that extra judicial confession of the accused is really a weak style of evidence which could possibly be manoeuvred because of the prosecution in almost any case where direct connecting evidence does not come their way. The prosecution is additionally counting on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal didn't say a word as to existence of some light at the place, where they allegedly saw the petitioners collectively on a motorcycle at 4.
Information on accessing opinions and case-related documents for the Supreme Court on the United States is offered over the court’s website.
ninety four . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's very well-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within ninety times. When the appeal will not be decided within that timeframe, he/she can then tactic the service tribunal to challenge the first order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, because the 90 times for the department to act has already expired. To the aforesaid proposition, we are guided from the decision of the Supreme Court from the case of Dr.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, It is additionally a nicely-recognized proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is subject matter to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to reach at its independent findings around the evidence.
148 . Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Specified the legal analysis on the subject issue, we have been in the view that the claim of your petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Original contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle isn't legally audio, Aside from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They may be subject to rules and regulations If your recruitment rules of the subject post allow the case in the petitioners for promotion may very well be considered, however, we have been apparent in our point of view that contractual service cannot be thought of for seniority and promotion because the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health and fitness, matter to availability of vacancy subject for the approval with the competent authority. Read more
whether though granting promotion senior employees were thought of for promotion or otherwise and submit the compliance report.(Promotion)
The legislation as set up in previous court rulings; like common legislation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
Justia – an extensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, as well as case regulation at both the federal and state levels.
In some jurisdictions, case regulation might be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family legislation.
1. Judicial Independence: The court emphasised the importance of judicial independence as well as the separation of powers.
In addition, it addresses the limitation period under Article ninety one and one hundred twenty in the Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to seek cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule eleven CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more
The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to establish click here a commission of internationally known and recognized scientists to review and rule on future grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power traces.